What are MPA Petitions *History *Current Status *Key Players *VCCFA's Position *Partner Positions *What Can You Do
Strength in numbers 84 Members and growing: Join today!
History
The current Marine Protected Area (MPA) petition process before the California Fish and Game Commission is the result of several years of public outreach, Commission direction, and scientific review following California’s first comprehensive evaluation of the MPA network.
The process began after California completed its first Decadal Management Review of the MPA network, which identified the need for adaptive management—recognizing that MPAs must evolve alongside changing ocean conditions, fisheries, and scientific understanding.
In response, the Commission initiated public outreach and guidance on how stakeholders could propose changes. In October 2023, the Commission formally announced the opportunity for the public, tribes, fishermen, and organizations to submit MPA regulation change petitions, providing direction on how to participate in the process.
By the end of November 2023, 20 petitions had been submitted, representing a wide range of proposals—from increased protections to expanded fishing access.
At its February 2024 meeting, the Commission took a major step by formally referring all 20 petitions to the California Department of Fish and Wildlife for scientific evaluation.
To guide this effort, the Commission—through its Marine Resources Committee—worked with CDFW and stakeholders to establish a structured evaluation framework, including:
A three-phase review process
Criteria based on science, feasibility, and policy considerations
Significant opportunities for public input
As part of this process, petitions were organized into categories (or “bins”):
(Bin 1) Near-term petitions with enough information for immediate evaluation
(Bin 2) Longer-term petitions requiring additional data, policy guidance, or resources
Throughout 2024, the Commission held multiple public meetings and committee discussions, allowing input from fishermen, tribes, NGOs, and the broader public as draft evaluations were developed.
By late 2024, CDFW presented draft recommendations on a subset of petitions. These were reviewed publicly through Commission and committee meetings.
On December 12, 2024, the Commission took action on the first group of petitions 5 Petitions (Bin 1) decisions either approving them for future rulemaking or denying them based on available science and policy considerations. Approval: The five petitions categorized under "Bin 1" (defined as noncontroversial and relatively simple changes, such as research opportunities) were granted. Outcome: These approved actions are now proceeding toward a future rulemaking process
The remaining 15 (Bin 2) were referred to CDFW for evaluation with ongoing public comment periods and stakeholder engagement.
As of 2026, the majority of petitions are still under active review. The California Department of Fish and Wildlife has been releasing detailed scientific evaluations, while additional policy input is being provided by the California Ocean Protection Council.